Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Dropping Bombs


“Harsh”, I thought as I tossed the New York Times Book Review back on the coffee table.  Rachel Shteir’s screed about the city of Chicago didn’t get that much of a reaction out of me at the time.  But hometowns are not easily mocked, and the article has been sticking around in my head ever since, as if it were a tiny rock in my shoe.   

I don’t pay taxes in Chicago, so I can’t call myself a Chicagoan.  Nor can I argue with the litany woes she opens with: the crime, the economics, the declining population, and of course, the weather.  Her observation that the overall acceptance of graft as a part of the scenery begets characters like Rod Blagoevich is astute and valid.

One can take issue with her tone, which is better suited to an undergraduate magazine than the Times Book Review.  Haughty rancor permeates the piece.  "And yet, even as the catastrophes pile up, Chicago never ceases to boast about itself.  The Magnificent Mile!  Fabulous architecture!  The MacArthur Foundation!"  Her patronizing exclamation points give some of the city’s most stalwart attractions all the glamour of a Carnival cruise, and she skips making any case as to why these aren’t things to boast about.  But it’s okay: “Thanks to global warming, the winters have softened”, she says, making light of a world-historic calamity and dressing it up as a mordant joke. 

Shteir writes as if Chicago stands alone in its boosterism, and proceeds through the article scandalized the city is bold enough to have even a Chamber of Commerce.  “The swagger has bugged me since I moved here from New York 13 years ago,” she states at the end of the second paragraph.  She’s burying the lead, because her coming from New York is what the piece is really about.  And that is what make it so frustrating.  A critic like Shteir can write a piece like this in Times, with all the heft that that carries, and in the minds readers worldwide, she’s right.  Furthermore, the intention of the piece, far more than to talk about the books at hand, still more than to incite the umbrage of Chicago partisans, is to give her a chance to retort.  She pricks the Midwestern hacks who she knows will cry foul, so that she can say, “See, look at this response.  It is a deluded rustbelt Stonehenge, and this is the only response these people can muster.”  She'll stick it to the city, and she'll get it coming and going.
           
But such bomb-throwing doesn’t wash the other way; it’s not even tolerated.  A critic from Chicago or anywhere else couldn’t write a front-page takedown of New York City and be taken seriously.  I can’t imagine I’ll ever read a serious article about NYC and its problems that takes time to deride “Central Park! The Statue of Liberty! The Empire State Building!” 

Our culture doesn’t countenance criticism of New York. As a nation, we’re constantly given a new way to sing its praises, whether the song is by Frank Sinatra, Billy Joel or Alicia Keys (and in the case of the latter two, whether or not the song is bombastic treacle).  The embrace of New York is taken not just as a matter of course, but as a dividing line between all that is cool and urban and happening and right and all that is dismissed as “Middle America”.  A non-New Yorker makes misinformed or insensitive statement about NYC and exposes himself as a small-minded hayseed.  A New Yorker makes the same statement about anywhere else and thinks it sophisticated. 

Indeed, Shteir’s piece is small-minded.  In her initial list of the woes of “Poor Chicago”, she places the Cubs ahead of the murder rate.  In her discussion of Thomas Dyja’s book, she implicitly lauds him for escaping to The Apple, then later, nauseatingly halts her praise to chide him for dissing her alma mater.  This is not the only lapse of equanimity to be found.  One wonders why, in 1700 words on the city of Chicago, the place she’s called home for over a dozen years, not one bright – or even neutral – spot can be found.  Perhaps the answer lies in what philosophers would call her facticity – her limitations given the circumstances.  It’s hard to make a name for yourself as a writer, and so far from your betters in Manhattan!  How to free oneself from these chains?  Well, you could drop bombs on where you live and see what happens. 

To paraphrase another piece the Times ran recently: you picked the wrong town. 

Monday, September 28, 2009

Honk for Engilsh

I was forwarded an email recently: pictures from "birther" and "tea bag" rallies from the past year or so in which right wing protesters misspelled their picket signs to hilarious effect. Examples included, "This is America and our only lanaguage is English", "Amensty" (with a big Ghostbusters 'X' through it), "Stundents for McCain-Palin", "Thank you, Fox News for keeping us infromed", among others. The pictures brought to mind the power of the slogan when espousing political rhetoric, and how their use replaces any actual dialogue or original thought, to say nothing of nuance or...meaning. And this what the front lines of the culture wars often boil down to. They might as well be standing on opposite sides of a fence yelling "Tastes great!" "Less filling".

I could also see it echoed in a short film I recently saw called "Taught to Hate". It follows a teenager's path as he first parrots the hate-speech of his elderly uncle, then spreads it to his friends and finally ends up assaulting and accidentally killing a migrant worker. While admittedly a bit on-the-nose, the film showed how old saws, inherited wisdom and useless statistics can clamor through the community like an empty safe falling down a stairwell. It made me think of another one of those photos from the email. A little girl sits next to her mother, squinting in the sun, holding a picket sign. Next to her stands a woman whose sign says, "No Amnety". I looked at the picture and thought, "her parents should know better". But then, who taught them to spell?

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

The Recital

Stardancers Horizon is in Glendale, California, a largish suburb on the far east side of the San Fernando Valley. On the third Sunday of November, as wild fires loomed in the distance, there took a place a musical variety show of which I was a part. It was at this recital that I was to publicly display the reach and range of my musical ability, which have developed appreciably since I wandered into the music store down the street and wandered out with a standing date for piano lessons. I had never taken part in such an event before. My first dalliance with musicianship was guitar lessons from one Mr. Sato in fourth grade; the lessons often ended in tears, and I left to pursue another impossible dream: football. I did the diligence on practicing for the show, but I knew all along that the real fruits of my labor would turn up on this page.

*****

Five Star School of Music & Dance is located on a side street off Brand Blvd, the main commercial drag in Glendale. The painted piano keys that adorn the outside have been repurposed in the past decade, I suspect, by its Armenian-American ownership to take pride in the Red, White and Blue. A cursive caption reads, “Remembering 9-11”. I had been walking around the neighborhood one Saturday last February, listening to the Tom Waits song “Jockey Full of Bourbon” over and over when I happened upon it. I was looking at the guitars when Michael, the resident axe-wielder, approached me. Michael is a tall, pale guy with glasses that make him look bug-eyed and a goatee that, like his remaining hair, is translucent. When I mentioned that I’d been thinking about taking piano lessons, he turned me over to Edwin, the owner, saying, “he needs it, man. He needs the music!” Edwin offered me a single lesson at a certain price, but a nominal savings if I was to make this a regular thing. Ever the discerning consumer, I chose the latter, and may have skipped to the comic book store down the street, still listening to “Jockey Full of Bourbon”. I needed the music.

Edwin is Armenian by heritage but Iranian by birth. A bearish guy, he has a barrel chest, a woolly mustache, a smattering of acne around his neck, and pile of chest hair that flummoxes even the strictest collars. Growing up in Iran, he was locked in a room for two hours a day to practice piano. When he plays, his fingers are so quick it’s like they yearn for escape. He’s terribly warm. Much coffee is offered and drunk between twelve and one on Saturdays, and high-fives are in order whenever I nail a particular exercise.

I started fast in the lessons. So fast, in fact, that I began to think I had perfect pitch and would be playing Ray Charles tunes in no time. Edwin sold me a new Casio keyboard at a “used” price. A few weeks later, I was sure that I was tone deaf and wondered if I should just come to terms with the fact that I had no musical ability. In the ensuing months, I've gone back and forth between those extremes, but mostly remain in the middle. When I practice, even for a few minutes a day, the lesson goes well, and I feel good. When I let it slide, which is more often the case, I limp to the store, through the lesson and then back to my car in the parking garage.

Chattering about the recital began in early October. At the time, I was playing something called “Halloween”, a “Danse Macabre” for Dummies that Edwin wrote. It was fun, and I was getting it. I had remained noncommittal about attending the recital until Edwin opened a book, put it in front of me and said that this was what I’d be playing. He wasn’t asking. The song he chose, the exclamatory “Got Those Blues!” was appealing because it seemed easy. It was also simple and repetitive: a standard 12 bar blues (Edwin’s words) played twice, the second time with the right hand an octave higher. A flourish at the end. As it drew closer, the recital became more of a running gag in my own mind than something I’d actually committed to doing. I fell in love with the image of me standing shoulder to shoulder with a bunch of 11 year-olds like a line graph charting my own ridiculousness. I used it to entice a couple of friends into attending. I even considered buying a bow tie but didn’t want to give the game away. All the pieces were in the place for a barnstormer of a blog post.

It turns out that the too-hilariously named Stardancers Horizon is a practice/exhibition space for ballroom dancing. Mirrors along one wall and alternating corrugated/foil ceiling tiles reflect the action on the parkay floor. When necessary, the lighting can be lowered to the dramatic levels of a junior high social.

When I walked in, the woman taking tickets looked at me strangely and asked me to prove myself. A videographer monitored my young coevals as they ran about, chitchatting and tugging at their parents. The girls wore floor length dresses in either black or white; the boys, like me, rocked neckties. Equipment dominated the dance floor: three keyboards, an amp setup for the guitarists and a white baby grand in the corner, but there was still some parkay left over for the dancers. Yes, the dancers. Tables and chairs were dotted around. To the left, a card table sat laden with five-inch high plastic trophies--stars, of course. My friends Blake and Vy showed up to provide moral support, both dressed for the occasion. Feedback squealed as the MC called us to attention. Showtime.

Edwin himself set the tone early. The lights went down, and bathed in a saturated goldish glow, he performed a new age-y piece of his own arrangement. Take note, it stated: play, and play well. I should note at this point that I was not only the only grown man in the recital but the lone male to play the piano. Except for Shant Y--., a gourd-shaped little guy with high hair, who managed to play something on the violin, the rest of the boys chose guitar. One kid, the geeky, endearing Thor, wailed out an instrumental cover of a Muse song, with Michael laying down the bass line. My piano counterparts were a collection of daunting females, almost all of whom were pre-teens. The dangerously talented B--. sisters, Leah and Loren, went one after another, playing faintly familiar classical pieces with surgical precision. They later accompanied a singer, KC I--., on piano and cello.

Almost every kid did a bang-up job. They got up, played their song and exited to the polite applause of the crowd and hollers of their families. There was nothing funny or ironic or quaint about it. They played, and they played well. The numbered list of the participants on each table didn’t provide an accurate guide to who went when, so I sat there feeling rootless and endangered. I was losing my ability to pick and choose objects for ridicule. I had gone there to be the smartass adult and wound up like just another 12 year-old, red faced and fidgety.

And so it stung that much more when it was my turn, and I blew it. I could feel the blood percolate in my ears when the MC called my name. I gestured false confidence with my right hand as I crossed the floor and took my seat at white baby grand. The keys seemed to stretch out forever. The Casio I practice on is smaller, and so when I put my right hand where I was used to playing, it made an unfamiliar sound. I scrambled for the next octave, but clanked a discordant note with my left. It wasn’t exactly a false start, but it was enough to make Edwin call out, “C!” from the crowd and come over to set me right. I started playing, and knew I was going too fast. The two basic notes in “Got Those Blues!” are to be played long and short, long and short: bluesy. I was hitting them one after another, so that they sounded more like the beeping of a car when the lights are on or the door’s ajar. I made all the mistakes I had practiced myself out of: the wrong bass chords, the wrong changes, the wrong combinations. When it came time to go up an octave on the second go-round, I left a creaking pause while my hand searched for the keys. It’s a short piece to begin with, “Got Those Blues!”, but I finished it in half as much time as I’d practiced. When I was done, I held up my right hand again, this time to signal the polite applause.

*****

“Great job” Edwin said to me before I scuttled off the floor and back to my seat. Blake and Vy were equally encouraging. In truth, I wasn’t the worst kid there. I was more appropriate than the hip-hop dance crew, and more practiced than the girl who tried to play “Greensleeves” on guitar and kept getting lost and going back to the chorus. And I like to think I was braver than Hope J--., the octogenarian who was supposed go directly ahead of me but publicly demurred for lack of experience. Well, maybe.

After a couple more acts, there was a ten-minute intermission. There would be a trophy presentation, the MC reminded us, so please stay until the end. I suggested to my friends that we beat a path. As they went to pull their car around, I waited for Edwin, to say my goodbyes. He was on one of the synthesizers, coaching Minh M--., the other adult in the show, who’s awesome.

“Why were you so nervous?” asked Edwin, without looking up.

I said I didn’t know. I walked up closer to where he was.

“I’ve actually gotta get going, Edwin.”

“You are not staying until the end?” he asked me. He didn’t stop playing. “You will miss your trophy.”

“I’ll pick it up next week.”

Sunday, November 09, 2008

Pity the Exclamation Point

It's not the fault of this particular punctuation mark that it resembles someone leaping with joy. If the period is a stop sign, as we're taught in first grade, then the comma is it's coy cousin, with an appendage resembling the thumb of a carnival barker, saying, "More to come, folks, right this way." Following this line of thought, we have the semicolon, which Kurt Vonnegut described as a hermaphrodite. This is a just description, as it doesn't really know what it is. By all rights, we should be in a new sentence following the use of one; alas, we're not. It's more fully formed relation the colon is more useful, but less controversial, and hence less fun. It points the way to lists, examples, etc. but its presence is never in doubt, stylistically.

The question mark is pure bliss, as punctuation, because its use is never, um, questionable. Its very appearance is that of someone saying, "huh?" In a comic book, when a dialogue bubble holds only a question mark, one knows exactly what the character is trying to express. It is also possible to increase the intensity of one's question by using multiple question marks, a practice accepted colloquially, but not by any English teacher I've ever had.

Of course, if one is to use more than one question mark, it is usually accented by at least one of those exuberant people jumping for joy.

?!?

Yes, that's it. Here's a new idea. If you're going to use the above to end a sentence, why not just say, "What the fuck?" and be direct?

This brings me to my larger point, which is the overuse of the one who leaps in ever day communication. I have not seen as many exclamation points used so closely together in, say, Facebook status updates or online comments sections, or say, the outcome of...I don't know...an election, since second grade. There are those emails that could be mistaken for the High School Musical series:

i can't wait to see the dark knight!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! it's looks so great but too bad about heath!!!!!!!!!

or

can't make saturday but would love to see u!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Have to stay in because of difficulty with bowels!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In pain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't mean to come down on people's lack of grammitical consideration. I do think a person should state clearly at the beginning of an email that he or she is having a stroke, or an orgasm, or both. It's only fair, and it may aid in getting the sender the medical attention they so obviously need.

O, would the work but heed my advice!

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Why It Bothers Me So Much that DFW is Dead

I was sitting in a diner by my apartment, waiting to order dinner. I had gone down to the overly expensive grocery store to forage, and finding nothing, decided on the overly expensive diner. I hadn't brought anything to read, so I looked up nytimes on my Blackberry. Headlines. Headlines. Financial trouble. Campaign Shit. David Foster Wallace, Writer, Is Dead at 46. I gasped and then realized that I had gasped. "Suicide," I thought. I clicked on the article. His wife had come home around 9:30 the previous night and found that he'd hanged himself. I gasped deeper and held my hand up to my mouth. The waitress seemed to notice that I was staring in disbelief at my cell phone, but didn't ask. I ordered the French Dip.

The reason I was so self-conscious about my bereavement from this writer was that I hadn't been able to make it through one of his books. I'd gotten Brief Interviews with Hideous Men out of the library a few years ago and enjoyed most of it before I moved to California and had to take it back. In truth, I'd drifted away from it when it grew overtly experimental around "Adult World (II)" and couldn't keep up. The summer before, I'd purchased the anniversary edition of Infinite Jest and with great fanfare, decided to make it my summer project. After two hundred pages or so, I moved on, not to other projects that I can remember, but more likely to endless internet articles and movies from Netflix. I posted on Facebook that was going to pick it up again in memoriam but have not yet done so. From that Saturday evening until tonight, ten days later, I don't think a day has passed that I haven't read or seen or heard a tribute to the departed Mr. Wallace, and each time I do, I'm left with the feeling of how bad it just sucks.

That Monday at work, I read a couple of his shorter articles, one being a dissection of 90's action movies, which he reasoned had descended into what he called "Effects Porn", the other an account of growing up playing tennis downstate Illinois. In each article, he despensed such a deluge of knowledge and detail that it's as if he'd just opened his brain on the given topic. He wrote like you or I would write if there were no governor between what was actually going on in your head and what eventually eeked out of your fingers. Except it was interesting, and moving, and really, really funny.

But then, he killed himself. Prior to last Saturday, if I thought of David Foster Wallace, it was with a kind of comfort that there was someone out there who just that smart. Someone who seemed like he could conceive of everything have the wherewithal to tell about it. His death is a permanent asterisk on his record, an out for the rest of us who can say, "Well, yeah, but look what happened to him." And if you're like me, you don't need another excuse.

Sunday, April 13, 2008

Back to Africa

Some twenty-six hours after wheels up from LAX, I wandered out of the Depatures Terminal at Cape Town International, looking for the guy holding the sign with my name on it. Such a man was not to be found for over an hour. I never lost my famous reserve, however and spent the time drinking coffee and buying excess amounts of South African currency (Rand). In time, two blokes showed up to drive me to my pad:

The extent to which this place is nicer than my place in LA is embarassing, I suppose. Anyway, here's the view:


And my flatmates:



Kidding. I hung around the set all day Saturday. Here's a report
  • [redacted]
  • [redacted]
  • [redacted]
Good times. I slept late today and then walked around. More to come.




Sunday, October 14, 2007

Time Well Spent

In an effort to quell a reader revolt, I decided to write a post about wasting time. Then, I thought, I’d look up that article from Wired about the efficiency guru that I’d seen about seven hours ago while wasting time at a newsstand. Then, a page into the online article, I went back to the blogger page and started writing my post about wasting time. I wrote two sentences and got sick of it. I went outside and got my iPod out of my car because although I've listened to the new Radiohead, I haven't really absorbed it yet.

I walked to my car at the end of the street, staring at the Griffith Park Observatory off in the distance. The one in Rebel Without a Cause, which I rented last summer after reading an article that made fun of people who hadn’t seen it. I came back, sat down and looked at the two sentences. They still sucked. So then I went back to that article about efficiency. The efficiency guru recommends breaking down everything you have to do into do-able actions. Irony of ironies, then, that I’d sat down to write a post about wasting time and here I was, being taken off the task by an alluring article about efficiency!

It should be self-evident that the internet is the biggest enabler of my time eroding habit. I am the junkie and the internet is my old buddy from around the way who gets the really good shit. Even when my entire day is spent in front the computer, my contact lenses drying out from its infernal glow, the first thing I do when I get home is open up Firefox. Couldn’t I be out jogging or volunteering? Christ, I'm young. I'm well-educated. There is a rock somewhere that should be climbed, by me. I should also be more involved in the political process, because the problem is not the politicians but the assholes who do nothing.

Here's the rub: if I did Habitat for Humanity, when would I find time to read? Don’t tell anyone, but I still haven’t read Madame Bovary. I never finished Moby Dick either, it’s sitting on top of Infinite Jest on my coffee table. That's okay because nobody ever finishes Infinite Jest; the important thing is to have it in your home so you can talk about it to others who have tried and failed (the footnotes alone, bollucks!)

My lack of efficiency is the main reason behind my not getting cable television. Many a hungover morning, it’s been my chief desire just to turn on Sportcenter and let it wash over me. I've been meaning to get into The Shield or Mad Men or Robot Chicken or any of the other shows that make up the so-called second golden age of television in which we are currently living, but I have too many books to not finish and blog posts not to write and movies to nod off to after the first half hour (and contained in those DVD’s are hours and hours of extras, which is the reason I bought the DVD in the first place).

One must also pay attention to YouTube, for one must have the cultural currency to spend on the water cooler conversations around the non-existent water cooler in the office. However, one must also pay attention to The World, because American culture is one of rampant solipsism. One must be able to speak about Tay Zonday and Mahmoud Ahmedinijad with equal fluency.

Therefore, I will wrap it up. I'll save any more casually-dropped references to Great Literature and effortless turns of phrase so you can write your congressman or cut a record on your Mac.

But first, do yourself a favor and watch this R. Kelly video.